⟨14Al₂Me₆⟩ ⟪(Lu)² (ping me when replying)⟫ That's... Bad ⮪ I get the sentiment, but as been pointed out to you by multiple people, that is simply not how software development works out IRL. You might note that in the referenced issue, right above the request for reconsideration is the original answer; if someone found the 👍 button, they must have also seen the answer, however old it is. But being old does not automatically mean...
... it's outdated. If the rationale behind the original response has not changed, what would be the point in rehashing the same comment -- which the petitioner is of course not receptive to -- every time a thumb gets added?
Ultimately principia is a two-dev project, and their time is very limited. It's better for them to spend that time on useful features, like flight plan optimization, than convincing a select few vocal individuals that no, this is not possible.  (Please differentiate between those who do not know why Principia is not on CKAN, versus those who would comment on that issue.)
In the end, CKAN is a open-source project. If someone really wanted to allow, at least on a technical level, the distribution of Principia through CKAN, they could have gone and implemented the management of system dependencies themselves. But I note that the associated CKAN issue has been untouched for years, so evidently nobody has actually considered having to download a single zip once every 28 days to be trouble enough.
If you want an example of people 'not believing no', I would, with respect, ask that you review the recent backlog in this channel.
As such, I ask that we move on to talking about something else; this is, as discussed above, not a productive use of time.